Going to try something different for archer need an opinion.
4 posters
Going to try something different for archer need an opinion.
Okay, here recently I've been wanting to make an archer on Csro. I have had archers in my past on Isro and have tested quite a different builds. This time I am wanting something different and have came to two decisions.
1st: Bow / Light / Force
2nd: Bow / Cold / Force
Now I know what everyone is thinking why is Fire not included?
Well, I have had a Bow / Fire / xxx build before don't get me wrong they are much stronger embue wise, but that and the phy dmg increase are really the only + side to them. However, it isn't what I am going to be looking for. The archer was originally designed for long rang combat, and quick get aways they were also known to be partially magical based. If you play any other mmo you will see that archers are meant to be a hybrid build, and some are even healers. That isn't why I am necessarily choosing the force class though. What I had planned to do w/ this build was design it for debuff's and run, or freeze and debuff and tear the opponent apart. Now here comes the opinion of you guys choosing the 2ndary force class. The benefit w/ Ice is: I can freeze/slow them down, mana shield, defense buff the downfall is immunity to cold, and it is slow as hell. Now, looking at the pvps I have noticed that only the wealthiest on the game are immune to cold. The 2nd option is Lightening and the benefit w/ it is: higher damage w/ the embue + it causes them to lose some parry ratio, speed, magical increase-which helps since the builds was originally designed as hybrid, and parry ratio increase which means the opponent will do less dmg than his/her max to you.
Let me know your opinions.
-llllll
1st: Bow / Light / Force
2nd: Bow / Cold / Force
Now I know what everyone is thinking why is Fire not included?
Well, I have had a Bow / Fire / xxx build before don't get me wrong they are much stronger embue wise, but that and the phy dmg increase are really the only + side to them. However, it isn't what I am going to be looking for. The archer was originally designed for long rang combat, and quick get aways they were also known to be partially magical based. If you play any other mmo you will see that archers are meant to be a hybrid build, and some are even healers. That isn't why I am necessarily choosing the force class though. What I had planned to do w/ this build was design it for debuff's and run, or freeze and debuff and tear the opponent apart. Now here comes the opinion of you guys choosing the 2ndary force class. The benefit w/ Ice is: I can freeze/slow them down, mana shield, defense buff the downfall is immunity to cold, and it is slow as hell. Now, looking at the pvps I have noticed that only the wealthiest on the game are immune to cold. The 2nd option is Lightening and the benefit w/ it is: higher damage w/ the embue + it causes them to lose some parry ratio, speed, magical increase-which helps since the builds was originally designed as hybrid, and parry ratio increase which means the opponent will do less dmg than his/her max to you.
Let me know your opinions.
-llllll
Last edited by llllllll on Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:38 am; edited 1 time in total
Re: Going to try something different for archer need an opinion.
Fire only a stronger imbue and physical damage increase? No. The most important buff in the fire tree is the magical defence buff. Pure STR characters without the magical defence buff simply won't do very good in PvP or other versus player stuff.
Both options seem to be very risky. However the "best" one would be pacheon/cold/force. Because it has more essential benefits, like Snow Shield, the physical defence buff and of course the imbue. But the only way I see this build working is going hybrid INT. Since you don't have a magical defence buff.
And the pacheon/light/force is just not worth it. No defence buff whatsoever. During versus players stuff you can better buy 100%+ speed potions.
Both options seem to be very risky. However the "best" one would be pacheon/cold/force. Because it has more essential benefits, like Snow Shield, the physical defence buff and of course the imbue. But the only way I see this build working is going hybrid INT. Since you don't have a magical defence buff.
And the pacheon/light/force is just not worth it. No defence buff whatsoever. During versus players stuff you can better buy 100%+ speed potions.
Zu- New Member
-
Number of posts : 68
Age : 31
Location : >:3
Thanked : 4
Silk : 5578
Registration date : 2009-05-03
Re: Going to try something different for archer need an opinion.
pacheon/cold/force is my bet too.
are u gonna be 1:1 hybrid or 70:70?
are u gonna be 1:1 hybrid or 70:70?
Unstoppable- Normal member
-
Number of posts : 379
Age : 35
Location : Raftel Island, New World
Job/hobbies : Playing Tennis/ Playing Dota
Humor : Ctrl + W = ???
Thanked : 9
Silk : 6337
Registration date : 2008-03-02
Re: Going to try something different for archer need an opinion.
unstoppable 70:70 = 1:1 ? xDDD i guess u mean 7:1 oder 70:30 or whatever hybrid is will be
yea i guess with thing with light is much weaker than pacheon/cold/force cause no snow shield or phys buffs
if you go decent hybrid you should have enough mana to not loosing all your mana when you are hit by a mob / in pvp through snowshield
and bow is imo the only chinsse class which can grind without speed cause ure are far range so you dont need to walk very much if you know where to farm
yea i guess with thing with light is much weaker than pacheon/cold/force cause no snow shield or phys buffs
if you go decent hybrid you should have enough mana to not loosing all your mana when you are hit by a mob / in pvp through snowshield
and bow is imo the only chinsse class which can grind without speed cause ure are far range so you dont need to walk very much if you know where to farm
Fire0rb- Administrator
-
Number of posts : 937
Age : 35
Location : Berlin, Germany
Thanked : 6
Silk : 7217
Registration date : 2008-02-07
Re: Going to try something different for archer need an opinion.
Fire0rb wrote:unstoppable 70:70 = 1:1 ?
70:70 isn't the same as 1:1.
70:70 = physical 70% magical 70%
1:1 gives you a balance of physical 75% magical 62%
Zu- New Member
-
Number of posts : 68
Age : 31
Location : >:3
Thanked : 4
Silk : 5578
Registration date : 2009-05-03
Re: Going to try something different for archer need an opinion.
Zu wrote:Fire0rb wrote:unstoppable 70:70 = 1:1 ?
70:70 isn't the same as 1:1.
70:70 = physical 70% magical 70%
1:1 gives you a balance of physical 75% magical 62%
Yes! its not the same fire orb,
when i said 1:1 = u distribute ur stats with 1str and 1int whereas 70:70 is i mean that tha balance of ur magical and physical. 70:70 = 1:5 hybrid i think.
Unstoppable- Normal member
-
Number of posts : 379
Age : 35
Location : Raftel Island, New World
Job/hobbies : Playing Tennis/ Playing Dota
Humor : Ctrl + W = ???
Thanked : 9
Silk : 6337
Registration date : 2008-03-02
Similar topics
» WTT/WTS Archer lvl 56 and Xbow lvl 43
» WTS [TROY] Lv 96 Archer
» WTS/wtt 93 archer in isro>hercules KEAP
» SELLING CHAR TheRedSun lvl 92 archer Full equipped
» PURE STR ARCHER OR PURE STR GLAVIER?
» WTS [TROY] Lv 96 Archer
» WTS/wtt 93 archer in isro>hercules KEAP
» SELLING CHAR TheRedSun lvl 92 archer Full equipped
» PURE STR ARCHER OR PURE STR GLAVIER?
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Sat Dec 12, 2020 5:43 am by mrz808
» Silkroad Guide Program eng / ger
Fri Jul 22, 2016 7:35 pm by Nyo
» Join Reanimated now! (Monolithic, now called World battle, div 1)
Fri Dec 19, 2014 8:02 am by Sephir0th/HeavenFang
» Back to cSRO ...
Fri Nov 21, 2014 9:22 pm by Viva
» Sensation Cap 90►Chinese Only►Silk/Hour►Old School►Daily EVENTS►Custom Glows
Fri Aug 30, 2013 6:49 am by tzaca1
» PlayOnGrid Thor | 110 Cap | 11D | Professional Team
Wed Aug 28, 2013 2:58 am by Titan
» PlayOnGrid Phoenix 125 Cap | 13D | Professional Team
Wed Aug 28, 2013 2:57 am by Titan
» OldSchool Cap 80 Server - lowrate
Sun Apr 21, 2013 4:55 am by nikluetke
» <<<<< *WTS Lvl 120 Glavie Sro-R Gobi* >>>>>
Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:22 pm by S1deCuT